Introduction
In the 21st century, amidst the complexities of our global landscape, two paramount challenges stand at the forefront: environmental conservation and social justice. While initially appearing distinct, these issues are intricately intertwined, each influencing and exacerbating the other. Recognizing this interconnection is paramount for forging a sustainable and equitable future. Environmental degradation and social injustice crises stem from entrenched flaws within our systems, prompting an urgent need for a profound reevaluation of our values and narratives. Prevailing cultural norms often reduce natural and human resources to mere commodities, perpetuating cycles of exploitation and inequality. To confront these daunting challenges, we must critically scrutinize oppressive structures and work toward their reconstruction in a manner that champions social justice. Unfortunately, the manipulation of these ideals by the global elite has marginalized specific populations, resulting in egregious atrocities. It is now more crucial than ever to overhaul our systems, prioritizing equity and sustainability, thus nurturing a world where all individuals can thrive.
Why It Matters
The intersection of environmental conservation and social justice is crucial as it impacts millions, particularly those disadvantaged due to social, economic, or racial factors. Consequently, as a result, these communities often bear the brunt of environmental harm. They reside in areas with poor air quality, limited access to clean water, and increased vulnerability to climate change. Additionally, these communities often lack the power to advocate for their rights and participate in environmental decision-making processes, constituting a clear violation of social justice. Furthermore, we often need to pay more attention to the beliefs that shape the central systems of society, such as power, money, and politics. These systems were designed to favor the wealthy, yet many who benefit from them fail to realize how their actions harm the environment and people’s well-being in the long run (Solomonian, L., Di Ruggiero, E, 2021).
Scholars widely recognize the need to address environmental conservation and social justice together. They argue that environmental degradation and climate change disproportionately impact marginalized communities and that ecological policies not considering social justice can exacerbate social inequalities.
Understanding Environmental Challenges and Social Justice
Ensuring fairness and equality in society is what social justice is about. Meanwhile, environmental conservation focuses on preserving our natural resources and maintaining the health of our planet. Therefore, an intersectional analysis of environmental conservation and social justice would examine how these factors interact and shape the experiences and needs of different social groups and how to address them holistically and inclusively. In the early 1980s, poor, primarily African American rural communities in North Carolina, United States, mobilized against a hazardous waste dump being built near their homes. This marked when the Environmental Justice (EJ) concept gained traction. (Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S. et al. 2020). However, the reality is that many communities worldwide do not have the right to live in a clean and healthy environment. Environmental Justice (EJ) advocates for it regardless of race, class, or nationality. Marginalized and low-income communities often shoulder the burden of environmental degradation and pollution. This highlights the intersection of ecological conservation and social justice.
At the heart of this discussion lies the “Tragedy of the Commons,” a concept of profound significance in dissecting the nexus between environmental preservation and social equity. Tracing back to the thoughts of William Forster Lloyd in 1833 and later explained more by Garret Hardin in 1968, this idea shows how bad it is when people only care about themselves and use things that everyone shares. It’s not just about hurting the environment but also shows how it’s unfair for everyone. For example, using water or fish without considering the consequences worsens the environment. And it’s unjust because it hurts some groups more, especially those already struggling with unfairness. When we don’t think about what happens when we use things like water or fish too much, things are worse for everyone, especially those already having a hard time. This means we must think more about how we use things and try to be fair to everyone.
Understanding the Tragedy of the Commons is essential because it helps us see that we need to change how we do things. It helps us know that we can make better choices for the environment and everyone so we can all live together fairly and happily. This demands the implementation of inclusive policies, the cultivation of shared stewardship ethos, and the amplification of marginalized voices in decision-making processes. By embracing this holistic ethos, we can chart a course toward a future where the harmony between human society and the natural world is preserved and thriving (Harward Business School, Feb. 2019).
Challenges and Critiques of Integrating Conservation and Social Justice
The discourse on integrating environmental conservation and social justice is complex and multifaceted. While many scholars advocate for a combined approach, critics highlight potential conflicts and challenges. Moreover, scholars point out that policies favoring economic growth and job creation, often seen as beneficial for social justice, might lead to increased environmental degradation. Additionally, simultaneously addressing both issues could require significant resources, posing a challenge for governments and stakeholders. For instance, implementing renewable energy infrastructure in low-income communities could be costly. These considerations underscore the intricate balance in navigating ecological conservation and social justice (Solomonian, L., Di Ruggiero, E., 2021).
What We Can Do
Addressing the intersection of environmental conservation and social justice requires a multi-faceted approach. First, it’s essential to recognize the intersectionality of these issues and acknowledge that specific communities are disproportionately affected by environmental degradation and climate change. One approach to addressing these issues is implementing policies and initiatives prioritizing ecological sustainability and social equity. For example, encouraging the development of renewable energy sources in low-income communities can reduce carbon emissions and provide economic opportunities for marginalized groups. Another approach is to involve and empower communities directly impacted by environmental issues in decision-making processes. This can include providing education and training to increase awareness of ecological and social justice issues and collaborating with community leaders and members to develop solutions that meet the needs of all stakeholders—similarly, supporting businesses and practices that are both environmentally friendly and socially responsible.
Addressing environmental conservation and social justice requires an integrated and collaborative approach that prioritizes the well-being of people and the planet. Here are some methods that can assist in recognizing and tackling interconnected concerns regarding environmental preservation and equitable treatment in society:
Community-based approaches: Engaging and empowering local communities can effectively address environmental conservation and social justice. Community-based approaches can involve working with local stakeholders to develop solutions that meet their needs and priorities.
Here are some examples: In Kenya, coastal communities have established associations to advance sustainable development. These associations actively engage with local stakeholders, such as fishermen, farmers, and community leaders. Involving these stakeholders, they craft effective strategies for marine ecosystem protection, biodiversity conservation, and equitable resource access. Illustratively, they join forces in initiatives like beach cleanups, mangrove restoration, and sustainable fishing practices (IUCN, 2021).
Another instance involves the biocultural restoration efforts in Hawaii. In Hawaii, community-driven initiatives center around rejuvenating the ahupua’a land and coastal management systems. These systems, which faced near extinction during colonization, are now being revitalized collaboratively by local communities. Their restoration efforts include rebuilding traditional fishponds, stone walls, and other cultural and ecological elements. This holistic biocultural approach acknowledges the interwoven relationship between nature and culture, underscoring their joint significance in conservation (IUCN, 2021).
Intersectional analysis: An intersectional analysis examines how different forms of social inequality intersect and impact environmental issues. This can help to identify solutions that address multiple forms of inequality simultaneously. Here is a good example. Climate change and gender: Climate change affects people differently based on gender identity and expression. For example, women and girls are more likely to experience poverty, food insecurity, violence, displacement, and health risks due to climate change, especially in developing countries. This is because they often have less access to education, resources, decision-making, and rights than men and boys. Moreover, gender norms and roles can limit their mobility, participation, and resilience in the face of climate disasters. Therefore, an intersectional analysis of climate change and gender would examine how these factors interact and shape the experiences and needs of different gender groups and how to address them holistically and inclusively (Yale Sustainability, July 28, 2022).
Innovative Financing Mechanisms: Innovative financial mechanisms involve investing in projects with environmental and social benefits, such as renewable energy infrastructure in low-income communities. One example of an innovative financial mechanism for environmental and social initiatives is the Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM), launched by the Asian Development Bank in 2023. The ETM exemplifies how innovative financing mechanisms can leverage public and private funds to achieve environmental and social outcomes. The ETM aims to help developing countries in Asia and the Pacific transition to a low-carbon economy while ensuring energy security, affordability, and reliability. The ETM also supports the affected communities and workers’ social and economic well-being by providing alternative livelihoods, skills training, and social protection (The World Bank, April 13, 2023).
Partnerships and collaborations: Partnerships and collaborations between different stakeholders, such as governments, NGOs, and private sector organizations, can help to leverage resources and expertise to address environmental and social challenges. One good example is the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), a partnership that sets standards for the fishing industry. It was founded in 1997 by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Unilever, a multinational consumer goods company. The MSC aims to promote sustainable fishing practices and protect marine ecosystems and biodiversity (McKinsey: Creating partnership for sustainability, July 2014).
Technology and innovation: Technology and innovation can provide new solutions for addressing environmental conservation and social justice challenges. For example, blockchain technology, a distributed ledger system allowing for secure, transparent, immutable transactions and data sharing among multiple parties, can provide greater transparency and accountability in environmental and social initiatives. Blockchain technology can be used for various purposes that support environmental conservation and social justice, such as tracking carbon emissions and credits, improving supply chain sustainability and energy transition mechanisms, enabling decentralized energy systems, enhancing the effectiveness of international aid for environmental sustainability, etc. (Foresight Brief Oct. 2020).
Global Models of Environmental Conservation and Social Equity: Success Stories from Costa Rica, Germany, Bhutan, Ecuador, and Nepal
Ecuador: Ecuador is a country that has made significant efforts to protect its rich biodiversity and natural resources, as well as the rights of its Indigenous peoples and local communities. Ecuador was the first country in the World to recognize the rights of nature in its constitution, which means that nature has the right to exist, persist, maintain, and regenerate its vital cycles (Earth Law Center, September 2021). It has established a protected area network covering about 20% of its territory (The Nature Conservancy in Ecuador). Ecuador has supported the environmental activism of its citizens, especially the Indigenous and rural communities, who have resisted and protested the threats of extractive industries and agribusiness to their lands, water, and culture (Kimberley Brown, July 2021).
Nepal: The community forestry program in Nepal has been widely praised (Abhaya Raj Joshi, December 2023: Community Forestry is a Conservation solution in Nepal) for significantly increasing the country’s forest cover from 26% to 45% over 25 years. Originating in the 1970s, this program empowers local communities to manage their forests for their needs and advantages. Under the program, communities operate according to an approved operational plan supervised by the divisional forest officer, a representative of the provincial government. Members of these communities can collect wood within government-prescribed limits, which are determined based on the wood’s availability and the forest’s condition.
Bhutan: Bhutan, located in South Asia, is known for its Gross National Happiness (GNH) index, which prioritizes social and environmental well-being over economic growth. The country has implemented policies prioritizing ecological conservation, such as maintaining at least 70.77% of its land as a forested area (Arun Rai, Dec. 2019, Understanding Forests Beyond Forest Cover: Bhutan’s REDD+ journey). This achievement is primarily credited to Bhutan’s supportive conditions for conservation efforts and the sustainable management of forests.
Costa Rica: Costa Rica has achieved remarkable environmental results, especially in forest conservation. It is the only tropical country that has increased its forest cover from 40% to 60% of its land area. In 2019, the government received a Champion of the Earth award – the United Nation’s highest environmental honor—for protecting nature and its commitment to ambitious policies to combat climate change. Costa Rica also received a payment from the World Bank in August for cutting carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. This was part of a program that supports local communities that conserve and restore forests. The program aims to boost rural incomes and resilience by encouraging climate-friendly activities in forest areas. The program also has a green business fund that helps forest owners and non-owners who are not eligible for other benefits (The World Bank, Nov. 2022).
Germany: In Germany, stakeholders and citizens have played an essential role in planning and progressing towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with an environmental dimension. Germany’s National Sustainable Development Strategy (GSDS) emphasizes that a broad societal consensus on the SDGs is a precondition for achieving them. The varied and numerous activities of the ‘Fridays for Future’ initiatives in Germany have increased the pressure on the government to be more active on environmental protection issues (European Environment Agency, Dec. 2020). Additionally, the government has implemented several social programs to support low-income households transitioning to renewable energy, such as subsidies for energy-efficient home renovations.
Promoting Environmental Conservation and Social Equity through Community Engagement: The EPA’s Collaborative Problem-Solving Program
The Collaborative Problem-Solving Program, led by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States, stands as a compelling example of environmental preservation and social equity. Through this program, the EPA addresses environmental, public health, economic, and social challenges within local communities. By bringing together a diverse array of stakeholders, including nonprofits, government bodies, faith-based organizations, and private sectors, collaborative initiatives are employed to address specific issues collectively. This approach fosters a constructive and non-adversarial environment, enabling stakeholders to collaboratively envision and pursue initiatives to enhance community well-being and sustainability. Additionally, the EPA has implemented five notable case studies exemplifying successful models for community engagement and advancing environmental conservation and social justice initiatives (Environmental Justice Collaborative Problem Solving Program, EPA).
Despite many community issues’ intricate and deeply rooted nature, the following five case studies demonstrate that diverse coalitions can achieve enduring solutions through cooperative endeavors:
Indochinese Cultural and Service Center (ICSC) – Tacoma, Washington: Discover the ICSC in Tacoma, Washington, a hub of successful community engagement and environmental leadership. Through innovative strategies, the center fosters collaboration and sustainability within local communities.
End Revitalization Association, Inc. (WERA) – Mebane, North Carolina: Take a journey to Mebane, North Carolina, and learn from WERA’s insights into community revitalization and environmental advocacy. Their emphasis on community-driven efforts sparks positive, lasting change.
Anahola Homesteaders Council (AHC)-Anahola, Hawaii: Explore the AHC in Anahola, Hawaii, where innovative approaches address environmental and social challenges in homesteading communities. Witness their commitment to community empowerment and resilience.
Make the Road by Walking (MRBW)-Brooklyn, New York: Experience MRBW in Brooklyn, New York, a testament to grassroots initiatives driving community health and sustainability. They empower local communities through collaboration to enact meaningful social and environmental change.
Pacoima Beautiful – Pacoima, California: Visit Pacoima, California, and witness Pacoima Beautiful’s dedication to community-driven environmental conservation and social justice. Their advocacy ensures equitable access to resources and promotes sustainable practices for all.
Intertwined Relations and Equity: Advancing Inclusive Environmental Sustainability
Acknowledging the interconnectedness of environmental justice with human and non-human well-being is vital in achieving sustainability and biodiversity preservation. Authors Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S. et al. 2020 stress the need to incorporate environmental justice frameworks beyond just focusing on the fair distribution of environmental burdens and benefits. This call for inclusivity aligns with the findings of Adrian Martin et al. (Biological Conservation, 2016), who emphasize the interdependent nature of biodiversity preservation and addressing injustices. According to the authors, highlighting the integral relationship among protected areas, cultural diversity, and vulnerable communities, it becomes evident how indigenous perspectives often suffer misrepresentation within conventional conservation strategies. This underscores the importance of considering climate change alongside environmental conservation and social justice efforts.
Recognizing the interconnectedness of social justice and environmental conservation components is essential for fostering fairness, inclusivity, and resilience across all communities. As articulated by Fernandes-Jesus, Maria ORCID, et al. 2020, a social justice perspective on climate change acknowledges that marginalized groups, particularly in the global South, will disproportionately bear the brunt of climate variability due to limited infrastructure and resources. Moreover, inequalities within countries further compound these risks, with the poorest and most marginalized populations facing heightened vulnerabilities to climate change impacts. Therefore, integrating climate change considerations into environmental and social justice frameworks is imperative for addressing these interconnected challenges and working towards a more equitable and sustainable future.
In addressing environmental issues, traditional liberal theories of social justice have proven inadequate in reconciling competing moral claims (Earthly Goods, Environmental Change and Social Justice, Edited by Fen Osler Hampson, Judith Reppy 1996). It emphasizes that passive or inactive approaches to addressing environmental issues do not adequately consider the unequal representation of affected parties, meaning certain groups are not correctly heard or represented in decision-making processes. Additionally, these passive approaches do not effectively address the underlying causes of environmental problems, such as unsustainable energy consumption patterns, which often stem from industrial practices and consumer behaviors. The authors attribute the root cause of the ecological crisis to modern industrial capitalism, which prioritizes economic growth over environmental concerns. They suggest that prioritizing fairness, inclusivity, and sustainability in ecological efforts is essential for creating an equitable world for present and future generations.
International Environmental Treaties and Agreements: A Framework for Global Conservation and Social Justice
The following are global treaties and agreements that tackle various issues, including environmental preservation, mitigating climate change, conserving biodiversity, and promoting social justice:
Paris Agreement (2015): The Paris Agreement focuses on combatting climate change by setting targets to limit global warming. It stresses the importance of fairness and recognizes varying responsibilities between developed and developing countries.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): The UNFCCC provides a framework for global cooperation to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations, emphasizing differing responsibilities based on historical emissions and development levels.
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992 prioritizes preserving biodiversity and ensuring equitable access to genetic resources, particularly for indigenous communities.
International Labor Organization (ILO): Although not primarily environmental, ILO Conventions, such as Convention No. 169, address social justice issues pertinent to ecological protection. These agreements intersect with conservation efforts by acknowledging the rights of marginalized communities.
The Stockholm Declaration (1972): While non-binding, the Stockholm Declaration establishes principles for environmental protection and sustainable development. It emphasizes the right to a healthy environment for all individuals. It underscores the responsibility to preserve it for current and future generations, highlighting the interconnection between environmental preservation and social justice.
Analyzing the Efficacy and Critique of Global Environmental Accords
The Paris Agreement has faced criticism due to its voluntary nature and weak enforcement mechanisms, leading some to doubt its effectiveness in addressing the climate crisis. Similar concerns have been raised about the UNFCC and CBD, with critics pointing out implementation challenges and insufficient support for developing countries. Similarly, some argue that ILO conventions lack enforcement mechanisms and fail to protect marginalized communities’ rights adequately. While influential in shaping environmental discourse, the Stockholm Declaration has been criticized for its limited impact on concrete action. While these treaties have significantly contributed to international efforts to address environmental conservation and social justice, various challenges have limited their effectiveness, including weak enforcement mechanisms, insufficient funding, and lack of political will. Addressing these shortcomings will be crucial for achieving meaningful progress toward a more sustainable and equitable future.
Similarly, the Kyoto Protocol, established in 1997 to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, is widely viewed as a failure for various reasons, including inadequate participation from major emitters like the United States and China, inefficiencies in meeting emission reduction targets, criticism of flexibility mechanisms, and in terms of its compliance, efficiency, and effectiveness. This underscores the difficulty of achieving impactful climate action through international agreements alone. Barriers to implementing such treaties, especially for least developed countries, encompass limited institutional capacity, political will, resource constraints, complex obligations, technology access issues, insufficient data, and climate adaptation needs. These challenges impede effective treaty implementation, posing significant hurdles for least-developed countries in fulfilling their international commitments and addressing pressing global issues like climate change and environmental conservation.
Despite criticisms, agreements like the Paris Agreement, UNFCCC, and CBD have raised awareness and promoted climate change and biodiversity cooperation. However, concerns persist about implementation and support for developing nations.
The Triumph of the Montreal Protocol: A Model for Effective Environmental Treaty
Established in 1987, the Montreal Protocol is a landmark environmental treaty safeguarding the Earth’s ozone layer. Its primary objective is to eliminate the production and use of ozone-depleting substances (ODS), such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons, commonly found in refrigerants, aerosols, and foam products. This treaty is regarded as one of the most successful environmental agreements ever adopted. So far, the signatories of the Protocol have eliminated 98% of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) worldwide since 1990.
Satellite observations and scientific studies have documented the gradual healing of the ozone hole over Antarctica, offering a tangible testament to the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol. Since most of these substances are potent greenhouse gases, the Montreal Protocol also significantly safeguards the global climate system (UN Environment Program). The ozone layer acts as a protective shield, shielding the Earth from harmful sun ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which can lead to various adverse health effects in humans and environmental damage, including skin cancer, cataracts, and harm to marine ecosystems. One of the remarkable aspects of the Montreal Protocol is its legally binding targets, which compel participating countries to take concrete actions to phase out ODS over specified timeframes (Britannica).
As a collaboration model, the Montreal Protocol underscores the importance of international collaboration and robust regulatory frameworks in addressing global environmental challenges. It is a shining example of how concerted efforts by the international community can yield positive outcomes for preserving the Earth’s natural systems and the well-being of present and future generations (The U.S. Department of State: The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer).
Conclusion
The intersection of environmental conservation and social justice is a complex issue, but it is a necessary journey. By understanding this intersection and acting, we can work towards an environmentally sustainable and socially just future. Despite criticisms, many scholars advocate for addressing environmental conservation and social justice together, acknowledging the challenges and trade-offs involved while aiming to find solutions that balance environmental, social, and economic considerations. Similarly, experts worldwide have rallied for ecological justice, advocating for equal rights to environmental resources and protections.
Yet, there is hope—a beacon in the storm. We—the stewards of Earth—must collaborate across borders, disciplines, and ideologies. We must listen to the whispers of the wind, the rustle of leaves, and the cries of the marginalized. Solutions emerge when we honor the needs of both people and the planet.
So, let us weave a new narrative—one where conservation and justice intertwine. Let us plant trees, advocate for clean air, and champion policies that uplift the marginalized. Let us be architects of sustainable practices, mindful of the delicate balance between self-interest and shared destiny. In this delicate dance, we find not a tragedy but the promise of a harmonious world—where the commons thrive and justice prevails.
References:
- Berkes, F. (2021, May 10). Community-based Conservation
- Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/science/ozone-layer
- Brown, Kimberly. “Environmental Defenders in Ecuador Aren’t Safe, New Report Shows.” Mongabay, 7 July 2021 https://news.mongabay.com/2021/07/environmental-defenders-in-ecuador-arent-safe-new-report-shows/
- European Environment Agency. (2020). Germany country profile: SDGs and the environment. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/sustainability-transitions/sustainable-development-goals-and-the/country-profiles/germany-country-profile-sdgs-and
- Fernandes-Jesus, M., Barnes, B., & Diniz, R. F. (2020). Communities reclaiming power and social justice in the face of climate change. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 6(2/2), 1-21. http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/5518
- Martin, A., Coolsaet, B., Corbera, E., Dawson, N. M., Fraser, J. A., Lehmann, I., & Rodriguez, I. (2016). Justice and conservation: The need to incorporate recognition. Biological Conservation, 197, 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
- Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peña, L., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020). Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1621-1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8
- Rai, A. (2019, December). Understanding forests beyond forest cover: Bhutan’s REDD+ journey. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/redd/news/detail/en/c/1238354/
- Rosen, A. M. (2015). Politics and policy: The wrong solution at the right time: The failure of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. Politics & Policy, 43(1), 30-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12105
- Solomonian, L., & Di Ruggiero, E. (2021). The critical intersection of environmental and social justice: a commentary. Globalization and Health, 17(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00686-4
- Spiliakos, A. (2019, February 6). The tragedy of the commons: What it is and five examples. Harvard Business School Online. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/tragedy-of-the-commons-impact-on-sustainability-issues
- The Nature Conservancy in Ecuador: https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/latin-america/ecuador/
- The World Bank. (2022, November 16). Costa Rica’s forest conservation pays off. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/11/16/costa-rica-s-forest-conservation-pays-off
- United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
- United Nations Environment Program; https://www.unep.org/ozonaction/who-we-are/about-montreal-protocol
- United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). (2020, October). Blockchain Technology and Environmental Sustainability. Foresight Brief No. 019
- The U.S. Department of State: The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozon Layer; https://www.state.gov/key-topics-office-of-environmental-quality-and-transboundary-issues/the-montreal-protocol-on-substances-that-deplete-the-ozone-layer/
- The World Bank. (2023, April 13). Innovative strategies to finance sustainable development; https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/04/13/innovative-strategies-to-finance-sustainable-development
- Yale Sustainability, July 28, 2022); Yale Experts Explain: Intersectionality and climate change; https://sustainability.yale.edu/explainers/yale-experts-explain-intersectionality-and-climate-change